Kamuck v. Shell Energy Holdings GP et al
Plaintiff: Edward E. Kamuck
Defendant: Shell Energy Holdings GP, Shell Energy Holdings LP and SWEPI
Case Number: 4:2011cv01425
Filed: August 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Tioga
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 113 OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 103 MOTION to Strike and 90 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Pursuant to Rule 41(b), Or in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Shell Energy Holdings GP, SWEPI, Shell Energy Holdings LP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 25, 2015. (kjn)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants motion for entry of a Lone Pine order (Doc. 44 .) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court will convene a telephone conference with the parties on September 20, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. to address the discovery process in this case. SEE MEM0 & ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 5, 2012. (kjn )
April 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER re: Report & Recommendation 33 of Magistrate Judge Carlson - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. R&R 33 REJECTED in that defts' MTD 11 DENIED w/ re: Shell Energy Holding LP, LLC.; 2. In all other respects the R&R 33 ADOPTED as follows... a. Defts' MTD 11 GRANTED w/ re: to... (see Paras 2a(i)-(v) for specifics), b. Defts' MTD pltf's remaining tort claims (Counts 8, 9 & 10) DENIED., c. Defts' motion to strike 13 GRANTED as to pltf's breach of contact punitive damage claim, but DENIED in all other respects. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 04/27/12. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kamuck v. Shell Energy Holdings GP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward E. Kamuck
Represented By: Alan S. Fellheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shell Energy Holdings GP
Represented By: Jeremy A. Mercer
Represented By: William D. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shell Energy Holdings LP
Represented By: Jeremy A. Mercer
Represented By: William D. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SWEPI
Represented By: Jeremy A. Mercer
Represented By: William D. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?