Messner v. SWEPI, LP
Plaintiff: Edgar H. Messner
Defendant: SWEPI, LP
Case Number: 4:2013cv00014
Filed: January 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Tioga
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER: United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's July 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation 21 is ADOPTED in full. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/14/13. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Messner v. SWEPI, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SWEPI, LP
Represented By: Jeremy A. Mercer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edgar H. Messner
Represented By: Robert J. Burnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?