Almazan v. Tellez

Plaintiff: Roque Gutierres Almazan
Defendant: Concepcion Ariaz Tellez
Case Number: 4:2013cv00678
Filed: March 14, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Bucks
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt; DIRECTING the clerk to transfer 4:13-CV-0678 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; initial screening of the complaint 1 and disposition on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 are deferred to the transferee court; DIRECTING the clerk to close the file. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/13/13. (km)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Almazan v. Tellez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roque Gutierres Almazan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concepcion Ariaz Tellez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.