MARKS v. CONIZEN HEALTH CARE, INC. ET AL et al
Defendant:
Paul Leggone, Conizen Health Care, Inc. et al, Teresa Law, Juneene Davis, L. Hams and Ed Shoop
Plaintiff:
Devine Marks
Case Number:
4:2013cv00726
Filed:
March 20, 2013
Court:
Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office:
Williamsport Office
County:
Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Matthew W. Brann
Referring Judge:
Susan E. Schwab
Nature of Suit:
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions)
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| August 26, 2014 | 51 |
ORDER: ADOPTING Magistrate Judge Schwab's Report and Recommendation 49 ; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to the extent set forth in the Report and Recommendation 34 ; DISMISSING Plaintiff's medical malpractice claims in their entirety; DISMISSING the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Shoop; REMANDING the action to Magistrate Judge Schwab for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/26/14. (km)
|
| June 19, 2013 | 18 |
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 ; on or before July 11, 2013 plaintiff shall file an amended complaint; (see order for further details); the action is remanded to Mag Judge Susan E. Schwab. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/19/13 (lg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.