Masciantonio et al v. SWEPI LP
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 16, 2016
ORDER granting SWEPI LP's motion 84 , APPROVING supersedeas bond 85 -1 filed w/ SWEPI's motion & directing that any enforcement of this ct's order & jdgmt 80 entered on 7/15/16 is STAYED pending final disposition of any & all appeals of said jdgmt. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/16/16 (ki)
|July 15, 2016
ORDER & JUDGMENT re 80 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. SWEPI's MSJ 60 is DENIED.; 2. Pltf's MSJ 57 is GRANTED.; 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of pltfs & against SWEPI in amt o f $4,144,000 w/ interest, as follows: a. $2,072,000 to be pd to pltfs Janet Masciantonio & Martin Masciantonio; & b. $2,072,000 to be pd to pltfs Paul R. Latshaw & Paul B. Latshaw in their capacities as co-trustees of Phyllis E. Lats aw Residuary Trust Created Under the Will of Phyllis E. Latshaw.; 4. Pltfs' alternative count for fraudulent inducement DISMISSED.; 5. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See order & jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/15/16. (ki)
|September 9, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING report 31 of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, DENYING defts' MTD 6 pltfs' complaint, & noting order setting matter for case mgmt conference shall issue forthwith. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/9/14 (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?