Ruley v. Whipple
Plaintiff: Rashaun Ruley
Defendant: John Whipple
Case Number: 4:2014cv00478
Filed: March 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Lycoming
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER (MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry) - GRANTING Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment 45 ; DISMISSING the case with prejudice; DIRECTING the clerk to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/16/16. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruley v. Whipple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rashaun Ruley
Represented By: Robert A. Hoffa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Whipple
Represented By: Gregory R. Neuhauser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?