Beenick v. LeFevre et al
Michael Beenick, Jr. |
LeFevre, McConnell, Dittsworth, Weaverling and Pagan |
4:2014cv01562 |
August 8, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Centre |
Thomas M. Blewitt |
Matthew W. Brann |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 53 ; denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 45 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Clerk directed to enter final judgment in favor of defendants and to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/26/16. (lg) |
Filing 18 ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed previously as separate record document no. 17, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Magistrate Judge Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) regarding the disposition of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 10) is adopted in part and rejected in part. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied with respect to Counts I, II, III, and IV.Defendants' qualified immunity defense is denied at this stage in the procee ding, although Defendants may reassert the defense at a later stage.Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend to assert a need for future relief.The case is remanded to Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson for assignment to a Magistrate Judge.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/14/15 (km) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.