Beenick v. LeFevre et al
Plaintiff: Michael Beenick, Jr.
Defendant: LeFevre, McConnell, Dittsworth, Weaverling and Pagan
Case Number: 4:2014cv01562
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Blewitt
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 53 ; denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 45 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Clerk directed to enter final judgment in favor of defendants and to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/26/16. (lg)
May 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed previously as separate record document no. 17, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Magistrate Judge Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) regarding the disposition of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 10) is adopted in part and rejected in part. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied with respect to Counts I, II, III, and IV.Defendants' qualified immunity defense is denied at this stage in the procee ding, although Defendants may reassert the defense at a later stage.Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend to assert a need for future relief.The case is remanded to Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson for assignment to a Magistrate Judge.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/14/15 (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beenick v. LeFevre et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Beenick, Jr.
Represented By: Marianne Sawicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LeFevre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McConnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dittsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weaverling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?