HOUSTON v. MCCULLAH et al
| Eric Houston |
| JOHN MCCULLAH, MARK FLEMING, FRANSIS FASCIANA and HEATHER |
| 4:2014cv01853 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Outside State |
| JV |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER: In accordance w/the MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry 24, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 9 & 14) are GRANTED for the sole purpose of the filing of this action wit h this Court. Houston's action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 18) seeking appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/21/15. (km)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. The clerk of court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, and close the file in this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 9/23/2014. (djb) [Transferred from Florida Northern on 9/23/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
