Adams v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Edward A. Adams, Jr.
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2016cv00154
Filed: January 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 . The decision of the Commissioner is VACATED and REMANDED. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant. The Clerk is directed to close the case file. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/29/2017. (jn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward A. Adams, Jr.
Represented By: Patricia A. Shoap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?