Murchison v. United States of America et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Murchison v. United States of America et al

Murchison v. United States of America et al

Plaintiff:	Kenneth Murchison
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2016cv00206
Filed:	February 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Williamsport Office
County:	Union
Presiding Judge:	Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge:	Susan E. Schwab
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 25, 2017	Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation, set forth in a pro se filing at 38 are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation entered by Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab 37 is ADOPTED; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs subsequent, late Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Certificate of Merit 39 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to a enter judgment in favor of the Defendants and to close the case. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/25/2017. (jn)
August 18, 2016	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 ; all defendants claims are dismissed with the exception of a Federal Tort Claim Act against defendant United States; Murchison is ordered to file a certificate of merit by 9/9/2016. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/18/16. (see order for further/complete details) (lg)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 25, 2017

Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation, set forth in a pro se filing at 38 are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation entered by Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab 37 is ADOPTED; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs subsequent, late Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Certificate of Merit 39 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to a enter judgment in favor of the Defendants and to close the case. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/25/2017. (jn)

August 18, 2016

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 ; all defendants claims are dismissed with the exception of a Federal Tort Claim Act against defendant United States; Murchison is ordered to file a certificate of merit by 9/9/2016. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/18/16. (see order for further/complete details) (lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murchison v. United States of America et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Murchison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?