MCASSEY v. DISCOVERY MACHINE INC. et al
Plaintiff: James Mcassey
Defendant: Discovery Machine Inc., Anna Griffith, Todd Griffith, Molly Lusk, Howard Lewis and Vanessa Chapla
Case Number: 4:2016cv00705
Filed: April 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 71 MOTION to renew motion to compel discovery filed by James Mcassey. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 23, 2018. (kjn) (Main Document 76 replaced on 8/23/2018) (kjn).
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson 67 ; 2. Defendants motion to dismiss 62 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;3. All claims asserted agai nst Defendant Vanessa Chapla are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Chapla from the caption of the above-captioned action; and 4. The above-captioned action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial management. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/21/18. (ve)
July 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Magistrate Judge Carlsons Report and Recommendation 5 , is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants Rule 12(b)(6) motion 13 to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Plaintiffs ADA claim and corresponding disability discrimination claim under the PHRA are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; b. Plaintiffs aiding and abetting claim under the PHRA against Defendants Todd Griffith, Howard Lewis, Vanessa Chapla and Molly Lusk is DISMI SSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; andc. In all other respects, Defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff James McAssey is granted leave to file, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, an amended complaint that addresses the defects i dentified in this Order and the Report and Recommendation. Specifically, Plaintiff is directed to file a more definite statement of his sexual harassment and retaliation claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). Further, any amended c omplaint must be complete in all respects. It must be a new pleading which stands by itself as an adequate complaint without reference to the complaint already filed. Young v. Keohane, 809 F. Supp. 1185, 1198 (M.D. Pa. 1992); and 4. The above-captioned action is referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pre-trial management. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/20/17. (rw)
June 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 24 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by James Mcassey and granting 28 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Todd Griffith, Discovery Machine Inc., Anna Griffith, Howard Lewis, Vanessa Chapla, Molly Lusk. Further discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of any dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 13, 2016. (kjn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCASSEY v. DISCOVERY MACHINE INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Mcassey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Discovery Machine Inc.
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anna Griffith
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Griffith
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Molly Lusk
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard Lewis
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa Chapla
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Represented By: Henri Marcel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?