Hunt v. Potter County et al
| Roy Hunt |
| Potter County, Glenn C. Drake, II, Susan Kefover, Paul Heimel, Douglas Morley and Angela Milford |
| 4:2016cv01729 |
| August 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Potter |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's 53 Motion in Limine is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and in part deferred to trial. Defendants' 55 Motion in Limine is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/19/2020. (jr)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Potter County, Glenn C. Drake, II, Susan Kefover, Paul Heimel, Douglas Morley, and Angela Milford, and to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/5/2018. (jr)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 7 is DENIED. Defendants shall file an answer to the complaint on or before 6/7/2017. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/17/2017. (jn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
