AutoTrakk, LLC v. Automotive Leasing Specialists et al
AutoTrakk, LLC |
Automotive Leasing Specialists, Michael C. Caffrey and George Stauffer |
4:2016cv01981 |
September 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Lycoming |
Matthew W. Brann |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#44] is granted in part and denied in part; Pursuant to FRCP 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/6/18. (lg) |
Filing 39 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: The Motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to the following Counts: Count II and IX; The Motion is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the following Counts: Counts I, V, VII; and The Motion is DENIED as to the following counts: Count IV, VI, and Count VIII. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file an amended complaint no later than twenty one (21) days from the date of this Order, and to preserve secrecy, may file any portion of that amendment under seal. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/10/2017. (See Order for further details.) (jn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.