Perez v. N & B Lundy Corp.

Petitioner: Thomas E. Perez
Respondent: N & B Lundy Corp.
Case Number: 4:2016mc00396
Filed: October 12, 2016
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Williamsport Office
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 3, 2017 14 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: granting re 7 MOTION Motion for Adjudication of Civil Contempt; Respondent N&B Lundy Corp., d/b/a Pitter Patter Day School and principal Bobbi Jo Lundy are in civil contempt of Court for failure to comply with the Court Order of November 18, 2016 and are sanctioned (see order for further/complete details. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/3/17. (copy to Scranton Financial)(lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. N & B Lundy Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas E. Perez
Represented By: Bertha M. Astorga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: N & B Lundy Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?