Newhouse et al v. GEICO Casualty Company
David Newhouse and Patricia Newhouse |
GEICO Casualty Company |
4:2017cv00477 |
March 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Outside State |
Matthew W. Brann |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that GEICO's 42 MOTION in Limine is GRANTED. GEICO's 43 MOTION in Limine is DENIED. Within seven days of the date of this Order, the parties SHALL SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not bifurcate the upcoming jury trial as explained in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. Show Cause Response due by 3/14/2019. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/7/2019. (jr) |
Filing 36 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 28 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Upon resolution of the remaining claims in this case, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant on Count II of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, ECF No. 6. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/12/2018. (jr) |
Filing 17 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant GEICO Casualty Company's 10 Motion to Sever and StayPlaintiff's Bad Faith Claim is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/18/2017. (jn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.