Milbrand v. Miner et al
| William Milbrand |
| William Miner and Nathan Rhodes |
| 4:2017cv00761 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Northumberland |
| Yvette Kane |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)- IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants William Miner and Nathan Rhodes motion to dismiss Counts 1, 2 and 4 of Plaintiff William Milbrands amended complaint (Doc. No.19), is GRANTED. Counts 1, 2 and 4 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs pendent state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/24/18. (ve)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants motion 9 to dismiss is GRANTED as follows: 1. Count 4 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Counts 1, 2, 3, and 5 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Within t hirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to attempt to address the pleading deficiencies in his federal claims identified in the accompanying Memorandum and to reassert his supplemental state law claim. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/18/17. (rw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
