Kendall et al v. Lancaster Exploration & Development Company
| Charles Rice Kendall, Ann P. Hochberg, Bank of America and John J. Slocum, Jr. |
| Lancaster Exploration & Development Company |
| Chief Oil and Gas LLC, Chief Exploration and Development, LLC, Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation, Radler 2000 LP, Tug Hill Marcellus, LLC and SWN Production Company, LLC |
| 4:2017cv01117 |
| June 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Outside US |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 10 Defendant Lancaster Exploration and Development Company, LLC's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; 18 Defendant SWN Production Company, LLC's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; 19 Defendants Chief Oil & Gas, LLC; Chief Exploration and Development, LLC ; Radler 2000 L.P.; Tug Hill Marcellus, LLC; and Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; 30 Plaintiffs the Trustees of the Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust and the Trusteesof the Margaret O.F. Proctor Trust's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. A Telephone Status Conference is scheduled for 6/7/2018 at 3:00 PM before Honorable Matthew W. Brann. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/23/2018. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
