Wormuth v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Wormuth
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 4:2017cv01298
Filed: July 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the 23 Report and Recommendation is adopted; decision of the Commissioner is vacated and remanded; final judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/18/18. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wormuth v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Wormuth
Represented By: Sharon Gornstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?