Brown v. McGinley
| Kylieff Brown |
| Thomas McGinley, Edward Baumbach, Anthony Luscavage, Tracey Brokenshire, George Burns, Belles, Lt. Kramer, Bainbridge, Mactini and Emerich |
| 4:2017cv01400 |
| August 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Northumberland |
| JV |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/25/2018. (jr)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 13 Motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED; Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file a single, all inclusive Amended Complaint. Failure of t he Plaintiff to timely submit an amended complaint or otherwise respond to this Order will result in dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute. Defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/14/2018. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
