Bressi v. Brennen et al
| Aaron J. Bressi |
| Jeffery Brennen, Edward Purcell and Christopher Lapotskie |
| 4:2017cv01742 |
| September 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Northumberland |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Joseph F. Saporito |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 73 Magistrate Jude Saporito's Report and Recommendation is adopted; 48 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted; Clerk directed to close this case.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/13/19. (case closed)(lg)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Saporito's 41 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMIS SED; Plaintiff's 27 37 38 motions for summary judgment are DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiff is granted leave to amend only the excessive force claim that has dismissed without prejudice. If an amended complaint is not filed within 30 days of the d ate of this Order, however, those claims will be dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court will be directed to close this case. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/26/2018. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
