Kleinauskaite v. Doll et al
| Daiva Kleinauskaite |
| Clair Doll, Greg Brauley, Thomas D. Homan, Elaine Duke, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Jefferson B Sessions, III |
| 4:2017cv02176 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| York |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Susan E. Schwab |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's 37 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See Order for further/complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/23/2019. (jr)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 23 Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED AS FOLLOWS: Respondents Greg Brauley, Thomas D. Homan, Elaine Duke, the United States Department of Homeland Security, and Jefferson B. Ses sions, III, are DISMISSED. Daiva Kleinauskaite's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED. Within twenty-one days of the date of this Order, the Government SHALL PROVIDE Ms. Kleinauskaite a bond hearing; 29 Motion to Expedite is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to close this case. (See Order for further/complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/21/2018. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
