Hill v. Havens, Shrawder
| Nathaniel Hill |
| T.R. Havens and Brandon Shrawder |
| 4:2018cv00212 |
| January 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Lycoming |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/31/18. (rw)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The pltfs motion to reopen this action is DENIED, since the case has not been dismissed or closed. 2. The pltfs motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice to reconsideration of th is issue as this litigation progresses. 3. The pltf shall file a response to the dfts motion to dismiss on or before Friday, August 3, 2018. 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.7, the dfts may file a reply brief on orbefore Friday, August 17, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 20, 2018. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation 7 is adopted in part and rejected in part. The case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/29/18 (lg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
