Mauro v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al
| Dean Mauro |
| Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers LLC, Midea America Corp. and Midea Microwave and Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd. |
| 4:2018cv00539 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Outside State |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Property Damage Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for retransfer to the USDC Eastern District of California or in the alternative to consolidate is granted in part and denied in part; mot ion granted to the extent that it requests the consolidation of this action with Rice/Kukich vs. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. No. 4:15-CV-539 and Mauro vs. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al No. 4:18-CV-539; Plaintiffs in the now consolidated act ion are directed to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days; motions to dismiss in all three action will be denied as moot; Clerk directed to docket Plaintiffs' ex parte motion to allow alternative service (doc 133 in 4:17-CV-2028) and Plaintiff's motion to retransfer (doc 75 in 4:18-CV-539). See order for further/complete details).Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/20/18. (lg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
