Frayre-Castaneda v. Lowe
Petitioner: Arnulfo Frayre-Castaneda
Respondent: Craig A. Lowe
Case Number: 4:2018cv00569
Filed: March 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: JV
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 10 Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and is adopted; the Petition is dismissed; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/18/19. (case closed)(lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frayre-Castaneda v. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arnulfo Frayre-Castaneda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig A. Lowe
Represented By: Kate Mershimer(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?