Adkins et al v. Bradford County Probation & Parole Department et al
| Jeremy Karl Adkins and Keith Fitzwater |
| Bradford County Probation & Parole Department, Bradford County Public Defender's Office, Dawn Close and Maureen T. Beirne |
| 4:2018cv00624 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Bradford |
| JV |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Keith Fitzwater's claims and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Adkins has completed this Court's form application to proceed in forma pauperis and authorization to have funds deducted from his prison account. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Order to the Warden directing the Warden to begin deducting money from the inmates a ccount in the manner described in the Administrative Order. Plaintiff Adkins' action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/25/2018. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
