Achebe v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff: Chigozie Achebe
Defendant: Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Case Number: 4:2018cv01188
Filed: June 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Columbia
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 8/10/2021. (ve)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Achebe v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chigozie Achebe
Represented By: Wayne A. Ely
Represented By: W. Charles Sipio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?