Williams v. Mission One Educational Staffing Services

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Williams v. Mission One Educational Staffing Services

Williams v. Mission One Educational Staffing Services

Plaintiff:	Constance H. Williams
Defendant:	Mission One Educational Staffing Services
Case Number:	4:2018cv01271
Filed:	June 25, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Williamsport Office
County:	Lycoming
Presiding Judge:	Matthew W. Brann
Presiding Judge:	Martin C. Carlson
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2018	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The pltfs motion for leave to amend (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. In order to permit the scheduling of the settlement conference contemplated by Paragraph 3 of this order, the pltf shall file an amended complaint on or before Decemb er 28, 2018. We will DISMISS the pending motion to dismiss the pltf's original complaint (Doc. 10 ) as moot. IT IS ORDERED that this case is referred to - the Honorable William I. Arbuckle, United States Magistrate Judge, Who will serve as to settlement judge in this matter and who may schedule settlement conference sessions in this matter as requested by the parties. If the settlement conference has not concluded by December 28, 2018 the parties shall provide the court with a Joint Status Report regarding the progress of mediation on or before December 28, 2018.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 25, 2018. (kjn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2018

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The pltfs motion for leave to amend (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. In order to permit the scheduling of the settlement conference contemplated by Paragraph 3 of this order, the pltf shall file an amended complaint on or before Decemb er 28, 2018. We will DISMISS the pending motion to dismiss the pltf's original complaint (Doc. 10 ) as moot. IT IS ORDERED that this case is referred to - the Honorable William I. Arbuckle, United States Magistrate Judge, Who will serve as to settlement judge in this matter and who may schedule settlement conference sessions in this matter as requested by the parties. If the settlement conference has not concluded by December 28, 2018 the parties shall provide the court with a Joint Status Report regarding the progress of mediation on or before December 28, 2018.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 25, 2018. (kjn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Mission One Educational Staffing Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance H. Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mission One Educational Staffing Services
Represented By:	Christopher J. Conrad
Represented By:	Lara Kay Dellegrotti
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?