Dixon v. Marsh, et al
Edward Tyrone Dixon |
PA Attorney General and Robert Marsh |
4:2018cv01541 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Allegheny |
JV |
Matthew W Brann |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in Western District of Pennsylvania as case 2:18-cv-01094, filed 08/15/2018. (jw) |
Filing 6 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request to proceed ifp is granted; Clerk directed to Transfer this case to Western District of PA; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/15/18. (lg) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/15/18. (lg) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: case electronically transferred to Western District of PA (lg) |
Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (lg) |
Filing 3 Petitioner's Affidavit filed by Edward Tyrone Dixon. (lg) |
Filing 2 MOTION/application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Tyrone Dixon.(lg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Edward Tyrone Dixon.(lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.