Patel v. Lowe
Petitioner: Jitendar Kumar Patel
Respondent: Craig Lowe
Case Number: 4:2018cv01548
Filed: August 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Matthew W Brann
Referring Judge: Martin C Carlson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document9. Mail sent to Jitendar Kumar Patel. Envelope marked: RTS-Unable to Forward. (aaa)
September 4, 2018 Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 8. Mail sent to Jitendar Kumar Patel. Envelope marked: RTS-Unable to Forward. (aaa)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Patels Petition #1 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/31/18. (rw)
August 28, 2018 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jitendar Kumar Patel - The suggestion of mootness filed by the Government in this case, and the fact that Patel is no longer in ICE custody, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the petition be DISMISSED as moot. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 28, 2018. (kjn)
August 27, 2018 Filing 7 SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS Upon the Record as to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Craig Lowe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Swauger, Melissa)
August 16, 2018 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 4. Mail sent to Jitendar Kumar Patel. Envelope marked: RTS-No Longer Here. (aaa)
August 7, 2018 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of PWHC and OSC RECEIVED from USAO. (kjn)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on or before August 17, 2018. 1. Respondents shall show cause on or August 28, 2018 why the petitionershould not be granted habeas corpus relief. 2. Petitioner shall, if he so desires, file a reply to the response no later than September 11, 2018. 3. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition, and this Order on theUnited States Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 7, 2018. (kjn)
August 6, 2018 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (lg)
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause. (lg)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 EMERGENCY PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jitendar Kumar Patel.(lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel v. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jitendar Kumar Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Lowe
Represented By: Kate Mershimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?