Hoffman v. SCI - Waymart et al
| Ulysses Hoffman |
| Warden Sommers, PA-C Jane Doe, PA-C Loomis, Dr. Tomazic, Disiree Hartman, SCI - Waymart, LPN Gino Carachilo, PA-C Villano, Deputy Warden Delrosso, Correct Health Care Administration and Dr. Eisenburg |
| 4:2018cv01623 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Wayne |
| JV |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the complaint is construed as a request for voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Plaintiff's request for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED and his pending action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Defendants' respective motions to dismiss (Doc. 8) and for summary judgment (Doc. 10) are DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/24/2018. (jr)
|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/24/2018. (jr) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw Complaint by Ulysses Hoffman.(lg) |
| Filing 12 STATEMENT OF FACTS re #11 Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Gino Carachilo, Delrosso, Disiree Hartman, SCI - Waymart, Sommers.(DiTomo, Nicole) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Gino Carachilo, Delrosso, Disiree Hartman, SCI - Waymart, Sommers.(DiTomo, Nicole) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Gino Carachilo, Delrosso, Disiree Hartman, SCI - Waymart, Sommers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Certificate of Concurrence, #3 Proposed Order)(DiTomo, Nicole) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Eisenburg, Loomis, Tomazic, Villano.(Goodrich, Caitlin) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Eisenburg, Loomis, Tomazic, Villano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Goodrich, Caitlin) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED (lg) |
| Filing 6 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER (lg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (filed in 4:17-CV-1545) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Medical Defendants motion to sever is granted; the claims of lead Plaintiff Krushin will proceed under this (17-CV-1545) matter; Clerk directed to open the claims of Plaintiff Hoffman in a new action (18-CV-1623); the original filing date of Hoffman's claims will be preserved; Medical Defendants are directed to file responses to the severed complaint within 21 days. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/16/18. (lg)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by dfts Gino Carachilo, Delrosso, Disiree Hartman, SCI - Waymart, Sommers.(lg) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service on behalf of dfts Loomis, Eisenburg, Tomazic and Villano. (lg) |
| Filing 2 Waiver of Service on behalf of dfts Sommers, DelRosso, Carachilo, Hartman and SCI Waymart. (lg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ulysses Hoffman, pro se.(lg) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Administrative Order re Hoffman's ifp application previously issued in 17-CV-1545 (doc #15) (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
