EOG Resources, Inc. v. Miccio Family Limited Partnership
Plaintiff: EOG Resources, Inc.
Defendant: Miccio Family Limited Partnership
Case Number: 4:2018cv01775
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2018 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Miccio Family Limited Partnership.(Clark, Douglas)
November 2, 2018 Filing 8 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Miccio Family Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Appendix)(Clark, Douglas)
November 2, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Miccio Family Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Clark, Douglas)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. Miccio Family Limited Partnership shall have through and including 11/2/2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by motion or through answer. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/27/2018. (jr)
September 26, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Miccio Family Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Concurrence, #2 Proposed Order)(Clark, Douglas)
September 26, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas A. Clark on behalf of Miccio Family Limited Partnership (Clark, Douglas)
September 13, 2018 Filing 3 Letter to Counsel Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/13/2018. (jr)
September 12, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Miccio Family Limited Partnership and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (lg)
September 12, 2018 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM AND ECF REGISTRATION FORM mailed to Attorney Galligan (lg)
September 10, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miccio Family Limited Partnership ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 4538077), filed by EOG Resources, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EOG Resources, Inc. v. Miccio Family Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miccio Family Limited Partnership
Represented By: Douglas A. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EOG Resources, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas J. Galligan
Represented By: Nicolle R. Snyder Bagnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?