Greene v. Warden
Michael Greene |
Warden and PA Attorney General |
4:2019cv00376 |
March 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
CK |
Matthew W Brann |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TERMINATING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Greene's Section 2254 petition is deemed withdrawn and is dismissed without prejudice; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/16/19. (case closed) (lg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Michael Greene to withdraw petition. (nr) |
Filing 3 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Petitioner shall within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order complete and file with the Court the attached Notice of Election. Failure of Petitioner to comply with this Order will result in this Court ruling on the motion, document or pleading as captioned. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/27/2019. (jr) |
Receipt of payment from MICHAEL GREENE in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 3/5/2019. Receipt number 111023444 processed by aarlidge. (jjs, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (lg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 111023444), filed by Michael Greene. (Attachments: #1 receipt)(lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.