Nieves v. Department of Corrections et al
Luis Nieves |
Jamie A. Dench, Hearing Examiner Schneck, Judge M.B. Moyle, C.O. Lugo, SCI-Camp Hill, C.O. Parry, Judge Geroulo, C.O. Reading, Brian Kosch, Suzan Trinety, Lt. Talutoe, Warden Betti, Sgt. Misili, C.O. Yancy, Michael Goffer, C.O. Walker, Judge Trish Price Corbett, Tim Corbett, Department of Corrections, Kurt Lynott, Esq. and Michael J. O'Brien |
4:2020cv00652 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed.Signed by LP on 04/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER Signed on 02/08/2011. (Attachments: #1 0285)(lp) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED. (lp) |
Filing 2 U.S. MARSHAL - 285, AO 398 and AO 399 Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 398 form)(lp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Luis Nieves. (Attachments: #1 Duplicative/Supplement to Complaint received in mail on 4/21/2020)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.