Santiago v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Francisco Santiago
Defendant: Sgt. Poole, S. Wiggins and Barry Smith
Case Number: 4:2020cv01274
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: DB
Referring Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with a copy of Application to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff shall tender the full $400 filing fee or a fully completed and signed Application to Proceed IFP by 9/28/2020; failure to comply will result in the above captioned action being dismissed. Notice of Compliance - fee or IFP Application due by 9/28/2020. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/16/2020. (lg)
August 26, 2020 Filing 8 Letter dtd 8/21/20 from Francisco Santiago RE: inmate account request. (ao)
August 11, 2020 Filing 7 Letter from LP regarding the unsigned Authorization Section of the Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights)) (lp)
August 6, 2020 Filing 6 Incomplete/portion of IFP form filed by Francisco Santiago. (bg)
August 6, 2020 Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement,including certification by Francisco Santiago. (bg) Modified on 8/11/2020 (lp).
July 24, 2020 Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 07/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp)
July 24, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Federal & Local Rules, #4 398 Form, #5 399 Form) (lp) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/28/2020) (lp). (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/28/2020) (lp).
July 24, 2020 Filing 2 AO 398 Form Completed by Plaintiff. (lp)
July 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Francisco Santiago.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santiago v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?