Nicolas v. Barr et al
| Juan Jesus Gonzalez Nicolas |
| Clair Doll, William Barr, Simona Flores-Lund and Chad Wolf |
| 4:2020cv01652 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| William I Arbuckle |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to TERMINATE all pending motions. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/23/2020. (jr)
|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING Case reassigned to Honorable Matthew W. Brann and referred to Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle. (jkc) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (lg) |
| Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form)(lg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Expedite by Juan Jesus Gonzalez Nicolas, pro se.(lg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Juan Jesus Gonzalez Nicolas, pro se.(lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
