Gramajo-Gutierrez v. Barr et al
| Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez |
| Simona Flores-Lund, Chad Wolf, William P. Barr and Clair Doll |
| 4:2020cv01751 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| William I Arbuckle |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable.Docs. 3&4. Mail sent to Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez (ga) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as to Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez re #4 Order - 30 Day Administrative Order, #3 Order. (Attachments: #1 Doc 4 returned)(bg) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Mail (Docs 3 & 4) remailed to Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez with the inmate number on line two of the address field. (bg) |
| Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed.. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(sm) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER LETTER ISSUED (sm) |
| Filing 2 EMERGENCY MOTION to Expedite by Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez.(sm) . |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Odilio David Gramajo-Gutierrez.(sm) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
