Ahmed v. Barr et al
| Mamoun Ahmed |
| Simona Flores-Lund, Chad Wolf, William P. Barr and Clair Doll |
| 4:2020cv01752 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| William I Arbuckle |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Expedite (Doc. 2) is Denied as Moot and this action is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court shall close this file. See Order for details.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 10/30/20. (dmn)
|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING Case reassigned to Honorable Yvette Kane for all further proceedings. (jkc) |
| Filing 5 Mail (Doc. 4) sent to Mamoun Ahmed returned as 'RETURN TO SENDER'. No new address on file. (pjr) |
| Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed.Signed by LP on 9/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(mw) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED. (mw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Expedite by Mamoun Ahmed.(mw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Mamoun Ahmed.(mw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
