Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Hunter Cade Brown
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2020cv02300
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: William I Arbuckle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/28/2020, answer due 2/26/2021; Atty Gen served on 12/21/2020, answer due 2/19/2021. (sm)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE (sm)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Arbuckle in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 19-5. (jkc)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to All Parties YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 1/28/2021. (caw)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel S Dalke on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Dalke, Samuel)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s) in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (lg)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted; #1 Plaintiff's Complaint is now deemed filed; Clerk shall issue process to the USM for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 12/9/2020 (lg)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals.(nr)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Hunter Cade Brown.(nr)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Hunter Cade Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Transmittal Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Samuel S Dalke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hunter Cade Brown
Represented By: Jamie Ryan Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?