Poole v. Schmidt et al
| Arthur L. Poole |
| Kelly Pelcher, Robert J. Schmidt, Brian Clark, Jane Doe, -, John Doe and Dustin Sweitzer |
| 4:2021cv00201 |
| February 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Application to proceed ifp filed by Arthur Poole. (lg) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #1 Complaint is dismissed; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/18/2021. (Case closed.) (lg)
|
| Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/05/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP for formerly incarcerated individuals.)(lp) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Subpoena(s) by Arthur L. Poole. (lp) Modified on 2/5/2021 (lp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Arthur L. Poole.(lp) Modified on 2/5/2021 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
