Chonko et al v. Graham
| Mary Ann Chonko and Wayne Chonko |
| Mark R. Graham |
| 4:2021cv00339 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mark R. Graham.(Clark, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Clark on behalf of All Defendants (Clark, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/26/2021. (jr) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mark R. Graham and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (nr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark R. Graham ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 5487357), filed by Wayne Chonko, Mary Ann Chonko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.