Buehler v. Construction Specialties, Inc.
| Michelle Buehler |
| Construction Specialties, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00546 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Construction Specialties, Inc. answer due 5/31/2021. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/13/2021. (jr)
|
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Motion Upon Stipulation with Proposed Order by Construction Specialties, Inc..(Nolan, John) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Construction Specialties, Inc. shall respond to the Complaint on or before 5/7/2021. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/21/2021. (jr)
|
| Filing 6 Supplement by Construction Specialties, Inc.. to #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Stipulated Motion with Certificate of Service Proposed Order. (Nolan, John) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Nolan is instructed to file a separate form of Order for Judge Brann's signature/approval re Motion for Extension of Time to Answer using the civil event Other Filings > Other Documents > SUPPLEMENT; please do not refile the Motion. (lg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Stipulated Motion with Certificate of Service by Construction Specialties, Inc..(Nolan, John) |
| Filing 4 Letter to Counsel Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/6/2021. (jr) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Removal Case Title: Michelle Buehler v. Construction Specialties, Inc.; Court Name: Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas. with Civil Cover Sheet, Certificate of Service Filing fee $ 402, receipt number APAMDC-5526055.(Nolan, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John M Nolan, III on behalf of Construction Specialties, Inc. (Nolan, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Construction Specialties, Inc. from Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas, case number 21-0161. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 5523076), filed by Construction Specialties, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A&B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/25/2021) (pjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buehler v. Construction Specialties, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Construction Specialties, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John M Nolan, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Buehler | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey C. Dohrmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
