Saez v. Palange et al
| Ralph Saez |
| Michael V. Palange and Pennsylvania State Police |
| 4:2021cv00704 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Matthew W. Brann and referred to Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick for the filing of a Report and Recommendation. (jkc) |
| Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 4/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(cw) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. (Attachments: #1 285 Service Packet with IFP Notice)(nr) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Prisoner Instructions for Filing a Complaint, #2 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules) (nr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael V. Palange, Pennsylvania State Police lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Ralph Saez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
