Gantz v. Saul
Rodger Gantz |
Andrew Saul |
4:2021cv01110 |
June 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to All Parties YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 9/17/2021. (caw) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Craig Black on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Black, Bryan) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (nr) |
Receipt of payment from RODGER GANTZ in the amount of $402.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE- NON-PRISONER. Transaction posted on 7/16/2021. Receipt number 333077231 processed by epetrosk. (jjs) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 333077231. Complaint is now deemed FILED. (ao) |
Filing 4 ORDER - is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED without prejudice. (2) On or before 8/9/2021, Plaintiff is required to either: a. File a revised Motion to proceed in forma pauperis; or b. Pay the civil filing fee of $402.00. (3) Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 7/9/2021. (caw) |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals. (lg) |
Filing 2 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodger Gantz.(lg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Rodger Gantz. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gantz v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rodger Gantz | |
Represented By: | Christopher J. Marzzacco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Bryan Craig Black |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.