Bolton v. Stamm et al
Plaintiff: Phazon M. Bolton
Defendant: John Doe, C.O. Kimmel and Sgt. Stamm
Case Number: 4:2021cv01126
Filed: June 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: William I Arbuckle
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel by Phazon M. Bolton. (ga)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re #13 Letter - it is HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff's request for a Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 13) is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for subpoenas (Doc. 13) is DENIED at this point. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 8/5/2021. (caw)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to All Parties YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 9/7/2021. (caw)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by C.O. Kimmel, Sgt. Stamm. (Blake, Jonathan)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan M. Blake on behalf of C.O. Kimmel, Sgt. Stamm (Blake, Jonathan)
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Letter to Court from Phazon Bolton asking for a TRO and requesting subpoenas. (lg)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER - it is HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Second Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #9 is DENIED as MOOT, because the Court has already granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 7/26/2021. (caw)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Receipt of payment from PHAZON M. BOLTON in the amount of $55.18 for PLRA CIVIL FILING FEE. Transaction posted on 7/23/2021. Receipt number 333077289 processed by smurphy. (jjs)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Phazon M. Bolton. (ga)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Phazon M. Bolton. (dw)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Phazon M. Bolton.(dw)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Waiver of Service forms (AO 398 and 399), 7/6/2021 Order, Complaint and waiver envelope mailed to C.O. Kimmel, Sgt. Stamm, courtesy copy to PA Attorney General. Waiver of Service due by 8/5/2021. (Waivers not sent to Defendant Doe)(lg)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND AO 398 AND 399 WAIVER FORMS to defendants - IT IS ORDERED that #2 Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP is granted; #1 Complaint is deemed filed; Clerk directed to serve Complaint, etc. on Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 7/6/2021. (lg)
June 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Supplement filed by Phazon M. Bolton. (aaa)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 06/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Instruction Sheet, #2 Fed & Local Rules) (lp)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (lp)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Uncertified and incomplete Application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Partial form ). missing page 3. (lp)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Phazon M. Bolton.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bolton v. Stamm et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.O. Kimmel
Represented By: Jonathan M. Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Stamm
Represented By: Jonathan M. Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phazon M. Bolton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?