Housenick v. Nicholas et al
| Danielle Housenick |
| Wendy Nicholas, William Frantz, Nicole McKee, Mental Health Management, Jane and John Doe(s) and Lt. Knarr |
| 4:2022cv00153 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| MP |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #1 complaint is dismissed; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 3/9/2022. (Case closed.)(lg)
|
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 01/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/28/2022) (lp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Danielle Housenick.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
