Jackson v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
Plaintiff: Gerard Jackson
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00278
Filed: February 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2022 Filing 23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gerard Jackson with Prejudice (Paronich, Anthony)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 8/31/2022. (jr)
August 26, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement by Gerard Jackson (Paronich, Anthony)
June 1, 2022 Filing 20 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM APPROVED as to Attorney Matthew T. Anderson. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 6/1/2022. (lg)
June 1, 2022 Filing 19 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM APPROVED as to Attorney Christopher R. Pettit. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 6/1/2022. (lg)
June 1, 2022 Filing 18 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM APPROVED as to Attorney Kyle T. Anderson. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 6/1/2022. (lg)
May 25, 2022 Filing 17 Supplement by The Litigation Practice Group PC. to #13 Petition for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice . (Anderson, Matthew)
May 25, 2022 Filing 16 Supplement by The Litigation Practice Group PC. to #14 Petition for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice, . (Pettit, Christopher)
May 25, 2022 Filing 15 Supplement by The Litigation Practice Group PC. to #12 Petition for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice . (Anderson, Kyle)
May 25, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney(s) Anderson, Anderson, and Pettit are directed to file an updated petition with a correction on page 3 naming an attorney who has already been general admitted as associate counsel. Use the Civil Event Other Filings > Other Documents > SUPPLEMENT; please do not refile the petition or another fee will be charged. (nr)
May 23, 2022 Filing 14 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Christopher R Pettit on behalf of The Litigation Practice Group PC Attorney Christopher Pettit is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5953143.. (Pettit, Christopher)
May 23, 2022 Filing 13 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Matthew T. Anderson on behalf of The Litigation Practice Group PC Attorney Matthew Anderson is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5953132.. (Anderson, Matthew)
May 23, 2022 Filing 12 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Kyle Anderson on behalf of The Litigation Practice Group PC Attorney Kyle Anderson is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5953125.. (Anderson, Kyle)
April 8, 2022 Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF re #8 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) MOTION for More Definite Statement UNDER RULE 12(e) Reply In Support filed by The Litigation Practice Group PC.(Kurth, Jordan)
April 8, 2022 Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) MOTION for More Definite Statement UNDER RULE 12(e) filed by The Litigation Practice Group PC.(Kurth, Jordan)
March 28, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Kurth is directed to DISREGARD the Clerk's previous docket annotation to file the brief in support separately as the Brief in Opposition has already been filed. (lg)
March 25, 2022 Filing 9 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #8 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) MOTION for More Definite Statement UNDER RULE 12(e) filed by Gerard Jackson.(Paronich, Anthony)
March 25, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Kurth is directed to file the brief in support of motion to dismiss as a separate document using the Civil Event: Motions and Related Filings > Responses and Replies(Briefs) > Brief in Support; please do not refile the motion. (lg)
March 24, 2022 Filing 8 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER RULE 12(b)(6), First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction UNDER RULE 12(b)(1), MOTION for More Definite Statement UNDER RULE 12(e) by The Litigation Practice Group PC. (Attachments: #1 Memo Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kurth, Jordan)
March 1, 2022 Filing 7 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM APPROVED as to Attorney Anthony Paronich. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 3/1/2022. (lg)
March 1, 2022 Filing 6 Supplement by Gerard Jackson. to #5 Petition for Special Admission - Pro Hac Vice Signed Code of Conduct. (Paronich, Anthony)
March 1, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Paronich is directed to file a signed Code of Conduct page for the petition for special admission using the Civil Event Other Filings > Other Documents > SUPPLEMENT; please do not refile the petition or another fee will be charged. (lg)
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Anthony I Paronich on behalf of Gerard Jackson Attorney Anthony Paronich is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5863352.. (Paronich, Anthony)
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 LETTER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 2/28/2022. (jr)
February 28, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerard Jackson. The Litigation Practice Group PC served on 2/25/2022, answer due 3/18/2022. (Paronich, Anthony)
February 24, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Litigation Practice Group PC and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (nr)
February 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Litigation Practice Group PC ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 5858617), filed by Gerard Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerard Jackson
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Bower
Represented By: Anthony I Paronich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Represented By: Christopher R Pettit
Represented By: Jordan Michael Kurth
Represented By: Kyle Anderson
Represented By: Matthew T. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?