Vought v. Lowe et al
Petitioner: Erica Rose Vought
Respondent: Craig Lowe, Raymond Tonkin and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Case Number: 4:2023cv00057
Filed: January 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: DB
Referring Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (See Order for full/complete details) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 3/10/2023. (nr)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 3/10/2023. (nr)
February 13, 2023 Filing 4 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Craig Lowe, Raymond Tonkin by Craig Lowe, Raymond Tonkin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A--Criminal Court docket, #2 Exhibit(s) B--Prior Habeas Opinion)(Geiger, Gerard)
February 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerard J. Geiger on behalf of Craig Lowe, Raymond Tonkin (Geiger, Gerard)
January 13, 2023 Receipt of payment from ERICA ROSE VOUGHT in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 1/12/2023. Receipt number 111100530 processed by MB. (jjs)
January 12, 2023 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
January 12, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus submitted on 2241 Form ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 333), filed by Erica Rose Vought. (Attachments: #1 Petitioner's Statement and Arguments, #2 Document entitled "Illegal Warrant", #3 Documentation from the Pike County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Docket CP-52-CR-0000446-2021, #4 Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus Preliminary Hearing Statements and Exhibits in Support)(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vought v. Lowe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erica Rose Vought
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Lowe
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raymond Tonkin
Represented By: Gerard J. Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?