Laster v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Shermaine Laster |
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Wertzman and FCI-Allenwood |
4:2023cv00117 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
MP |
Matthew W Brann |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Shermaine Laster's #1 Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 03/21/2023. (ea) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Shermaine Laster. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 03/21/2023. (ea) |
Filing 9 TRAVERSE by Shermaine Laster to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #8 Response to Petition for Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit G-1) (ea) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Warden Wertzman by Warden Wertzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index, #2 Exhibit(s))(Butler, Michael) |
Receipt of payment from SHERMAINE LASTER in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 2/2/2023. Receipt number 333102998 processed by EP. (jjs) |
Filing 7 SHOW CAUSE ORDER Served on U.S. Attorney. (sh) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is DEEMED FILED; The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the #1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, its attachments, and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney. (See Order for further details) Show Cause Response due by 3/4/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 02/02/2023. (ea) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 333102998. Petition is now deemed FILED. (sm) |
Filing 4 EXHIBIT by Shermaine Laster re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit X, #2 Exhibit 7, #3 Exhibit) (ea) |
Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 01/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Shermaine Laster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Administrative Remedy Procedure for Inmates Informal Resolution Form, #2 Exhibit A-Administrative Remedy Procedure for Inmates Informal Resolution form, #3 Exhibit A-1-Copy of Email to Med. Associate Wardens from petitioner dated 10/21/2022, #4 Exhibit A-2-Copy of email to Med Unit 2 (Mr. Brown Unit Manager) dated 10/09/2022, #5 Exhibit A-3-copy of email to Counselor Brown regarding 2 BP8s - dated 10/23/2022, #6 Exhibit B-Request to Staff Member (Mr. Nicolas) from petitioner dated 11/01/2022, #7 Exhibit C-Inmate Message: FTC Auto-Calculation Transition Update, #8 Exhibit D-FSA Recidivism Risk Assessment, #9 Exhibit E-US DOJ Sexually Abusive Behavior Prevention and Intervention, excerpt from BOP Policy Manual)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.