Austin v. DOC Disability Accommodation Board
Shaun Austin |
DOC Disability Accommodation Board |
4:2023cv00361 |
February 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
MP |
Matthew W Brann |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION including brief for Preliminary Injunction by Shaun Austin.(nr) |
Filing 10 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DEEMED withdrawn. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 03/27/2023 (ea) |
Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following case management deadlines shall govern this case: Discovery due by 8/21/2023, the parties shall refrain from filing discovery requests with the Court. On or before 08/28/2023, the parties shall inform the Court whether they are agreeable to mediation. Dispositive Motions due by 9/29/2023. No extensions of the pre-trial schedule shall be granted absent good cause. (See Order for further details) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 03/21/2023. (ea) |
Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's #4 Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (See Order for further details) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 03/17/2023 (ea) |
Filing 7 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Petition for Removal (Complaint) by DOC Disability Accommodation Board. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A)(Pryzbylkowski, Francis) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Shaun Austin. (ea) |
Filing 5 AO 398 and AO 399 Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (nr) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Shaun Austin.(nr) |
Filing 3 Letter to the court re State Case, Filing Fee, and Motion for Preliminary Injunction from Shawn Austin. (Spoke to Counselor via telephone yesterday and explained the FF was paid) (nr) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DOC Disability Accommodation Board from Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, case number 2023-0507. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAMDC-6212665), filed by DOC Disability Accommodation Board. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Austin v. DOC Disability Accommodation Board | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shaun Austin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DOC Disability Accommodation Board | |
Represented By: | Francis H. Pryzbylkowski |
Represented By: | Karen Mascio Romano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.