Tice v. PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk et al
| Randy L. Tice |
| PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk and William Cory Stocker |
| 4:2023cv00823 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by William Cory Stocker.(Black, Seth) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by William Cory Stocker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Black, Seth) |
| Filing 14 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A)(Einerson, Christine) |
Filing 13
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer is GRANTED. William Cory Stocker may file his response to the Complaint on or before July 16, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 6/22/2023 (nr)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth Thomas Black on behalf of William Cory Stocker (Black, Seth) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by William Cory Stocker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Neely, Allen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT is GRANTED. Moving Defendants may file their response to the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) on or before July 13, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 6/14/2023 (nr)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT by PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Einerson, Christine) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk. (Einerson, Christine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine C Einerson on behalf of PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk (Einerson, Christine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Allen P. Neely on behalf of William Cory Stocker (Neely, Allen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randy L. Tice. William Cory Stocker served on 5/26/2023, answer due 6/16/2023. (Martin, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randy L. Tice. PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk served on 5/26/2023, answer due 6/16/2023. (Martin, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. (See Letter for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 5/22/2023. (jr) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk, William Cory Stocker and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s) in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PSP Trooper Tyler Prisk, and William Cory Stocker ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 6290082), filed by Randy L. Tice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - First email to Cory Stocker dated 6/14/2022., #3 Exhibit B - Second email to Cory Stocker dated 7/11/2022., #4 Exhibit C - Photo of Sidewalk, #5 Exhibit D - Poster used to protest) (ea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
